This is a sort of snarky book, but still very well-written. The author is tired of clichés that he believes the political Left has “captured,” but which he believes are simply not true. He spends the book deconstructing them.
Some of the clichés the author is upset about (written in the form of what he believes to be the dishonest belief):
The Left is non-ideological and only concerned with practical solutions
The Constitution is a “living document” that needs to change with the time
Social Justice is a good thing
Republicans don’t care about the poor
Diversity is always better
The Catholic Church (and organized religion in general) is evil
Violence never solves anything
And so on. There’s something in here to offend every Democrat. The author is a phenomenal writer, but he’s pretty biased in one direction, and he does slip into insults and snarkiness on occasion.
But he also does a really good job of rebutting a lot of arguments that we hear over and over again. There’s a lot of good information in here, much of which I was ignorant of. And he’s a great logician – many of his points are pretty airtight.
I admit that I came away from the book thinking that maybe I should examine things a little more closely, and perhaps question some of the long-held opinions floating around in my head.
In the end, however, it just proves something I’ve always suspected: a smart person who is a good debater can make almost any point palatable. I read this book and was nodding along, but I could put it down, pick up a book by a Democrat that talks about the same points, and nod along to that too.
Does this mean I’m just ideologically weak? Or does it mean that lots of areas of disagreement are murky, and it’s easy to strawman something from the pages of a book when the other side can’t respond.
I wish politics were simple, I really do. And I get uncomfortable when someone I consider to be the on the “other side” makes some really good points.
But, well, here we are.
Book Info
Author
Jonah Goldberg
Year
Pages
320
Acquired
I have read this book. According to my records, I completed it on .
A hardcover copy of this book is currently in my home library.
This is a historic Spanish coin, but most people probably know it as the name of a New Orlean’s newspaper: The Times-Picayune . It paper was so-named because it originally cost one Picayune. (Though mostly associated with the French, New Orleans was owned by the Spanish in the late 1700s. It was...
This has two common meanings, one depending on the other. Just after World War 2, ten veterans and their commander went to work at Ford. They had all served in the Army during the war in a unit called Statistical Control, which broke new ground in information management for logistics. After the...
In various definitions, I saw the words: “hodgepodge,” “mish-mash,” “haphazard,” “non-sensical,” etc. It comes from a Latin word for a mixed grain that was fed to cattle. Any grain that didn’t measure up to human standards, became a “farrago” for cattle.
It’s from the base word “rapine,” which means “to seize” in Latin. A few words in Latin that being “rap-” have similar meanings. rapina: robbery rapere: to snatch rape: forcible sexual contact
This is a theory that humans are inherently peaceful and are corrupted by modern society and economic systems. It’s mainly attributed to the French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who wrote in his Discourse on the Origin of Inequality : …nothing is so gentle as man in his primitive state, when...
We have a tendency to create arguments for the opposing viewpoint, then defeat them, when the argument we’ve created might not be accurate and we might have created it just because it was easy to defeat. “You think X, and that’s obviously wrong because of Y.” In truth, the other side might not...
