What is Content Integration?

By Deane Barker 3 min read
Author Description

We spend a lot of time making content that doesn’t exist in our CMS look like it does. This is an attempt to put a definition around that discipline.

AI Summary

This post explores the concept of content integration, emphasizing its importance in combining various content sources seamlessly. The author discusses how effective content integration enhances user experience, improves workflow, and supports consistent messaging across platforms, ultimately driving engagement and value for organizations.

Note

This is NOT about content integration in education.

A lot of people finding this post are looking for information about the concept of content integration in education. This is not that kind of content integration, sorry. Just thought I’ll tell you now before you got too far into this.

PS: I love teachers. You’re awesome.

Since I don’t feel there’s a good, all-encompassing name out there for this, I’m going to attempt to invent one –

Content Integration encompasses the philosophy, theories, practices, and tools around the re-use and adaption of content from our core repository into other uses and channels, or vice-versa: the creation and ingestion of content from other channels into our core repository.

Traditionally, we create content and store it in a repository. In many cases, this repository is also a delivery channel. A web content management system (WCMS) is the perfect example – we create the content in the WCMS, store it there, and deliver it from there. In many cases, our content stays entirely locked within the bounds of our WCMS. The entire lifecycle of that content – creation, management, delivery, archival, and deletion – happens inside of that system.

Content Integration would be the process by which we connect to content in that repository and use it in some other way. Content Integration occurs every time we connect a content-based system to the “outside world” to take in or push out content to other systems to allow for creation or consumption by other means.

For example –

Content management vendors tend to silently wage war against Content Integration by adding features to their systems in an effort to remove the need to go “outside” that system. In the first example above, WCMS vendors often built entire email messaging platforms into their systems to allow for this functionality in addition to the core web publishing.

This is done in the name of sales demos and competitive advantage but weakens the product overall because no vendor can ever predict all the possible ways content can be re-used. (While it’s easy to blame vendors, the guilt can probably be laid at the feet of their customers, who – being ignorant of the concepts of Content Integration – have historically equated “built-in” with “superior.”)

To circle back to the original definition, Content Integration is multi-disciplinary. It encompasses:

In the end, Content Integration is an umbrella which falls over a collection of knowledge and technology, the combination of which allows us to get more value out of our content – to reach greater numbers of content consumers, at less cost, with greater control, and less risk.

Selected Reader Comments

Like many blogs of its era, Gadgetopia allowed reader comments. Below are selected comments that were left on the original post.

Good article, making very clear where the pain is in content integration. There seems to be an accordion effect regarding the full suite of tools versus best of breed approaches. I completely agree that vendor attempts to add somewhat functioning features to their products so they can say they offer a complete product do not help the issue at all. One thing that will definitely help content integration is the development of open standards for interoperability. For content management, CMIS was intended to be such a standard. Ask your CMS vendor if they fully support this standard and in most cases you will get a vague answer. Make the full support for open standards a knonk-out selection criterion next time you have to select a product!

By
Johan Blok
When
about 2 days after the original post
Inbound link from this – Defining Digital Project Scope: What Do You Need? September 13, 2016

The first step on any implementation is to figure out what you need done. The range of services is vast.

Inbound link from this – Advanced Topics in CMS: Course Syllabus

This is the content for Deane Barker’s ‘Advanced Topics in CMS’ course taught at FH Joanneum in Graz, Austria.

Outbound link to this – The Dawn of the Web Content Delivery System (WCDS) June 13, 2010

Web content delivery is becoming so complex and important that it’s deserving of a system all its own that aggregates, harmonizes, and enhances content for delivery.

Outbound link to this – WCM Vendors: It’s Time to Abstract Your Repository September 5, 2010

Over the last decade, content management has become increasingly focused on the web. However, in this world of true multi-channel publishing, the web is just one of many channels, and its time CMS vendors made their repositories less web-specific.