Navigating Voluminous Blogs

By Deane Barker

As you get more and more entries in a blog, how to you ensure people can find what they’re looking for? Blogs are very front page-centric – unless you’re watching the front page everyday, browsing the site is terribly inefficient. The category pages are all but worthless on Gadgetopia because…

The document discusses the challenges of navigating large-volume blogs, particularly those with a high volume of content. It suggests that categories and category archive pages are not user-friendly and ineffective when the volume of content exceeds manageable levels. The author suggests that search technology is the future of navigating such large-volume blogs and recommends investing in this technology to improve user experience.

Generated by Azure AI on June 24, 2024

As you get more and more entries in a blog, how to you ensure people can find what they’re looking for? Blogs are very front page-centric – unless you’re watching the front page everyday, browsing the site is terribly inefficient.

The category pages are all but worthless on Gadgetopia because there’s just such a volume of content. We’re pushing 1,100 entries right now, and category pages have hundreds of entries on them. After the first ten, I just provide the title, but it’s still overwhelming and tedious to scroll through.

After a certain volume of entries get assigned to a category, it gets a little pointless. You have to keep sub-dividing categories and making them more and more granular to try and keep the number in each down to a manageable level. We even started a keyword concept to make pseudo categories on the fly, with some success. In the end, I don’t think categories are the answer because they eventually get more entries than is user-friendly for someone to browse.

Look at sites like CNet’s News.com. They have thousands and thousands of stories, so how to do find anything on their site? Do you use the categories? No – their site has five major categories, but once a story drops off the front-page of that category, there is no archive page. What would be the point? With only five categories and the volume of content on that site, browsing is not a really viable strategy.

Only one answer: search. When I want to find something on News.com, search is the only thing I try. After finding an article that’s close to what I want, I’ll sometimes drop to the “Related Stories” and navigate further from there.

For blogs with a large volume of content, search is the future, really. The category archive pages are pointless, and there’s no other solution than investing in search technology and try to help your users that way.

This is item #331 in a sequence of 357 items.

You can use your left/right arrow keys to navigate