Wuthering Heights

TLDR: “Boring, annoying characters”

Book review by Deane Barker tags: fiction, classic, interpersonal, psychology, romance 2 min read
An image of the cover of the book "Wuthering Heights"

This is a novel about crappy people. Or, specifically, one really crappy guy named Heathcliff, who is adopted by an Northern English family, treated poorly, and proceeds, over the course of generations, to extract his revenge on them in all sorts of different ways. Nothing acute and immediate, mind you – this guy is in for the long haul, and his revenge takes place over decades.

I have problems with classic novels, it seems (this one dates to 1847). I read them, and generally hate them, because I think I’ve been broken by contemporary fiction. I think I just fail to evaluate them in the context on when they were written.

Very few novels written before the 20th century have really, genuinely entertained me in the present. I can remember that Dracula was very good, and I was blown away by the ending of A Tale of Two Cities when I read it in college. But then I read things like Crime and Punishment or The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde or Pride and Prejudice, and I’m just…meh.

So, at the risk of pissing off literary purists, compared to a modern novel, this one is just a long snooze.

There are only two settings – two Yorkshire estates: Wuthering Heights and Thurcross Grange, which are about four miles apart, separated by the moors (hills, basically – the setting is just south of Scotland). All of the action takes place in one of these two houses. People argue, make up, get married, are born, die, weep, fight and have all sorts of drama in these two places (or occasionally in the space between them).

The character naming doesn’t help. I had this same problem with War and Peace and Shogun. It’s hard to keep track.

Almost the entire story is told in flashback, except the very beginning and the very end. Nelly narrates most of it, telling the entire dramatic history of the inhabitants of the two houses to Mr. Lockwood, who spends a couple nights at Wuthering Heights and is traumatized by how awful the people are. The long flashback is book-ended by a brief beginning and end in the present – the core conflict of the book is how the people came to be the way they are.

One of the problems is that the main(-ish) character sucks. Healthcliff is an abusive jerk. This is not a love story, which it’s sometimes presented as, and which the 2025 movie has been framed. The “love,” if you absolutely want to call it that, is perverse.

Also, I found the book confusing. I had to follow along with SparkNotes after every chapter, and I missed a lot. I don’t know if I stopped paying attention, or if the writing is just obtuse (or, again, if it was fine in its time, I’m just not putting it in the right context).

(I actually stopped reading it at 68%, but left the SparkNotes page open in my browser for months out of some feeling that if I closed it, I would be admitting defeat. I finally came back to the book and finished it in a 24-hour span, because I refused to let the book beat me.)

It got tedious at the end. There’s no big revelation, and I was just kind of happy it was over. I suppose there’s some satisfaction in the final disposition of some of the characters – the main theme is about a younger generation shedding the emotional baggage of the generations before them – but the entire story had been such a bore to that point, that I had stopped caring.

Book Data

Author
Emily Bronte
Year
Pages
331
Acquired
Open Library
OL21177W
Wikipedia
Wuthering_Heights
↓ Inbound link from – Easton Press: The 100 Greatest Books Ever Written
↑ Outbound link to – Crime and Punishment August 10, 2023

I know this is a classic, but I didn’t really enjoy it. It’s the story of an idiot who commits a murder. And when I say “idiot,” that’s not flippant – he’s written that way. The character is a failed student living in Saint Petersburg in the 19th century (I think it was called “Petrograd” back…

↑ Outbound link to – Dracula July 10, 2018

Great novel. Does not read like it was written 121 years ago. Genuinely terrifying in parts. Suffers a bit in the middle as the characters run around London, and I got a little confused as to what they were doing. It turns into a bit of a detective story. I got the main gist of what was going on,…

↑ Outbound link to – The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde November 19, 2022

So, here’s the thing – if you know the secret, there’s not much point reading the book. And everyone knows the secret by now – “Jekyll and Hyde” has become a common idiom. But back when this was published in Victorian England, no one knew the twist, and it was probably a hell of a surprise in the…

↑ Outbound link to – Pride and Prejudice July 18, 2016

I read this for a nascent classics book club I have become a part of. Sadly, I didn’t like it. It was a long haul, and I wouldn’t have finished it if not for the obligation. The book is fundamentally about a whole slew of terrible things we should probably leave in the past. There are terrible…

↑ Outbound link to – Shogun April 1, 2024

Oh, goodness, I didn’t like this book. And I feel terrible about that fact, because it’s a classic, but I just didn’t. This is a long, long book. I’ve read comparably long books like The Covenant and The Pillars of the Earth , but this is both long and very, very boring. It’s set in 1600. John…

↑ Outbound link to – War and Peace November 28, 2014

What can you say about this book that has been said a million times? it’s many things in one: a novel, a history, a philosophy, etc. I enjoyed reading it. It took me 50 days of fairly consistent reading – 30-60 minutes per day. The chapters are quite short, taking maybe five minutes, so I always…