On Corporate Thought Leadership…

By Deane Barker
AI Summary

This post explores the concept of collective thought leadership, emphasizing the importance of collaboration and shared insights among industry professionals. The author discusses how leveraging diverse perspectives can enhance credibility and drive innovative ideas in the digital landscape.

Do you see thought leadership being done on a corporate level? Or is this solely the province of individuals?

I’ve been wondering a lot about this lately.

Is there a company you associate with leading (and publishing) innovation? We all know PEOPLE like this, but is this ever done well on a corporate scale – as a group?

Think of an innovative company, right now. Why do you think they’re innovative? Strictly their products or service output? Their content/publishing output? The people they employ? (If so, why do think that of their people?)

I think back to the heydey of corporate research labs: Xerox PARC, Bell Labs, IBM Research, etc. Was this thought leadership? And does this exist now? If it does, has it changed – I’m wondering if we only celebrate the aforementioned institution in hindsight. (Consider that Microsoft has an R&D group, but I never really hear anything from them. Is it me?) Were they well-known across their industries during their productive years?

If a company wants to be known as a “thought leader,” does it just need to hire individuals that serve as such? Or is there something a company can do to be perceived this way, in aggregate?

(That belies another, more cynical point: are people actually thought leaders, or are they just perceived as such? Is thought leadership productive, or is it … performative?)

Lot of questions. Maybe you have answers?