The State of Microsoft Word in the Enterprise

By Deane Barker 4 min read
AI Summary

This post explores the current role of Microsoft Word in enterprise environments, highlighting its strengths and limitations. The author discusses integration challenges, user preferences, and the software’s evolving functionality amidst changing workplace needs, ultimately suggesting that Word remains an essential tool despite competition from other software solutions.

One thing that continues to amaze me is how poorly people use Microsoft Word, considering its dominance in business word processing. The “barrier to entry” for a Word user is extremely low – just open it and start typing – so very few people bother to learn how to really use it well.

I spent three hours yesterday cleaning up some poorly formatted Word documents for a client. They were an utter wreck and just changing the font and logo for the company took 30 minutes per document. Thankfully I got them put back together in a state that ensures they’ll be easier to change in the future.

The whole thing got me wondering what the ROI would be for a large organization to send everyone to classes on Word and to develop some kind of over-arching “word processing strategy.” For the amount of information that’s contained in Word documents in the average organization, they really don’t get much attention.

Some things I know:

Read this document for a top-level list of Word no-nos that just about everyone does unless they’ve been explicitly trained otherwise. Now, in order to not to be Fabian-esque, let me say that the consequences for making these mistakes are not fatal, and a lot of organizations do the same thing as you, so don’t feel bad. Think back – when was the last time you had a training class on Word?

(Let me tell you, though, that these things are not wasted. When I worked for Citigroup, they sent me to two four-hour classes on Microsoft Excel. When they told me I had to go, I thought it was silly, but I’ve used the information I learned in those classes over and over again since then. Not a week goes by that don’t do something with Excel that I wouldn’t have known about if not for those two classes, six years ago.)

Humor me for a minute: think about how much you know about Word, then ask yourself some questions –

I’m not saying that I’m the be-all and end-all of Microsoft Word, (this man is), but I’ve done a fair amount of research on it – certainly enough to believe that larger organizations really need to develop a word processing strategy. They need to think about how they’re using Word, how much data is contained in Word documents on their network, and how they could be managing the data better.

There are countless hours of wasted re-work that goes into maintaining Word documents that could really be avoided. I’m thinking there’s a decent market for a “Word consultant” – someone who comes into an organization and does nothing but evaluate and fix how they’re using Word. I’m betting the ROI would be huge.

Links to this – A Lack of Basic Text Formatting Skills April 28, 2006
Most content creators have a lack of basic formatting skills, making it difficult to have them create well-rendered content.
Links to this – Crucial Microsoft Word Skills That Just Don't Get Taught July 22, 2006
My church is building a huge new addition , and part of it is going to be a computer lab. This means that I’ll finally have a nice spot to teach some free computer classes, which is something I’ve wanted to do for a long time. I got to thinking the other day what I’d teach, and I think there’s...
Links to this – Theoretical vs. Actual Functionality May 19, 2006
Theoretical functionality is all the things a CMS can do. Actual functionality is the stuff you're actually going to use. There's a big difference.
Links from this – Fabian Pascal is Smarter Than Me September 3, 2005
The legendary Fabian Pascal showed up yesterday to tell us all that we were stupid over in the relational data model post . Specifically, his comment was: None of you know the relational model, which is why you think current products are relational, which they are not. This whole thread is...