Microsoft Excel as a Simple Content Storage Mechanism

By Deane Barker 1 min read
AI Summary

This post explores the concept of using Microsoft Excel as a content management system (CMS). The author discusses its advantages, limitations, and practical applications, highlighting how Excel can be an effective tool for managing content in various scenarios despite being unconventional for this purpose.

I was doing something for my church last night when I came face-to-face with ADO’s great support for extracting data from Excel files. So I got to thinking…how about Excel as a content storage system?

Let’s face facts, offices love Excel. Go to any office, and I promise you they’re storing something in Excel (they’ll probably tell you it’s a “database”). And this is not data with formulas or anything – they’re just storing it there because it’s easy to work with and an actual database program like Access is too much trouble. Lay people just “get” spreadsheets. They make sense.

So, whip up an Excel spreadsheet with a worksheet for each “object” and a column for each “property” so it’s an open system, and let them add rows as they wish. The column-and-row format is native and intuitive in Excel, it can be formatted so that there’s word-wrap within cells, you can protect areas like the top row (the column headings) so they can only edit the right cells, it has a built-in spell checker, etc. Sure, data-typing wouldn’t be that advanced, but most lightweight content management apps can live with that.

Using VBA and an FTP component (here’s a free one), you could write a macro that would FTP the file somewhere. The user opens the file, edits what they like, then clicks a toolbar button and the file is automatically FTPed to their Web hosting account, where it just overwrites the previous version of the file. (Write a COM add-in and this could be triggered by just clicking Save.) The user would essentially swap the entire database out whenever they made a change, but basic Excel files aren’t that big anyway.

Simplistic? Sure. Scalable? Nope. Easy to set-up and work with? Very. There are a lot of scenarios where this would be exactly the right thing.

Links from this – Open and Closed Content Management June 20, 2003
Different CMS allow you to define your content in different ways.