This is a “meditation” book. It’s not an exhaustive look at any subject, but rather it’s a meandering tour of some of the things we have to consider when examine something.
And what’s we’re examining here is big: how do we know things, and how to we transmit that knowledge? It’s basically discussing all of epistemology.
Here’s a list of some of the subjects, in rough order:
How do we teach knowledge to children?
How do we gather knowledge in libraries and other repositories?
How do we publish news and other time-sensitive information?
How is information manipulated to deceive?
How have computers and automation affected how we know things?
I read this at the same time I read Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War, and the two books are similar but different. They’re both distant looks at a subject, but this one strives to be more all-encompassing. It tries to wrap its arms around knowledge – to “bookend” it. Whereas Grunt was just a playful dive into specific, interesting topics.
Also, the writer is an older English man, and – frankly – he sounds like it. He’s a little dry. (Although there are some very interesting observations about misinformation based on his personal experience as a journalist on the ground during Bloody Sunday).
The chapters are interesting – all very long, but divided into clear, numbered sections which effectively become “subchapters.” I often stopped in the middle of a chapter, at one of these subchapter markings, which is something I’m loathe to do (I have to complete a chapter in a sitting, for whatever reason).
A good book. Never boring. But, like most books of this type, it’s tough to come away with specific knowledge (ha!) that you can retain and put to practical use.
Book Info
Author
Simon Winchester
Year
Pages
432
Acquired
I have read this book. According to my records, I completed it on .
A hardcover copy of this book is currently in my home library.
Superficially, this means “having to do with the Jesuits ” (for example: “a Jesuitical education”). However, there’s a deeper, more pejorative meaning to it. Dictionary.com includes this definition : practicing casuistry or equivocation; using subtle or oversubtle reasoning; crafty; sly;...
It’s literally Greek for “less pain.” It can be used for the entire category of painkilling drugs. The word is often used to mean “things that have been deliberately toned-down to reduce stress or anxiety.”
…maybe? The Huns were a nomadic civilization in Eastern Europe. They’re mainly known for their King Atilla (“Atilla the Hun”). The area in which they roamed and ruled very closely corresponds to the area of modern-day Hungary. The Huns were active in 300-400 AD. The country of Hungary was declared...
Someone who promotes some cause, but doesn’t totally understand it, or is ignorant of the fact that the cause is actually working against their own interests. They are an “idiot,” but a “useful” one, as far as the cause is concerned. No one is sure of attribution. Many people attribute it to Lenin,...
This was a wildly entertaining book, because of both the subject matter and the writing style of the author. The book is about military science, but not weapons. It’s about a bunch of the other, decidedly unglamorous things we do to enable humans to fight wars, and how science is trying to make...
Lots of people have been killed on Sundays, and the phrase is used to describe lots of mass killings. Wikipedia shows 20+ events that are connected to the phrase. The most recent event and the one most clearly associated with the phrase from this generation is a 1972 shooting of protesters in...
