This is a wonderful book that investigates how role-playing games like Dungeons and Dragon’s happened. Not the mechanical history behind it, but rather how they made “the elusive shift” from wargames to a more personal experience.
What is the relationship of the rules to the game? Are the rules the point, or is role-playing the point?
What are the different styles of play?
And so on.
The author is a RPG historian of note, and his sources for the book are hundreds of different fanzines, it seems. I used to be involved in the RPG community, and I remember Dragon, but the author has collected hundreds of references to articles and essays about theory.
The book goes deep on the subject, but stays incredibly readable. Along the way, it really makes you think about the concepts of storytelling, and how being part of a story alters your perception of it.
RPGs are fundamentally interactive storytelling, and the biggest question in the book, it seems, is whether the story matters more than the dice or the rules.
There’s no clean answer to that – opinions differ wildly – but the book is an absolutely joyful attempt to figure it out.
Book Info
Author
Jon Peterson
Year
Pages
336
Acquired
I have read this book. According to my records, I completed it on November 26, 2022.
A hardcover copy of this book is currently in my home library.
This is a role-playing game. I don’t really play role-playing games. I just read RPG rulebooks for fun. There’s probably some deep psychological reason for this – something about putting rules around imagination. No idea. (Watch this video some time: Theoretical Gamers VS Practical Gamers ) (Also,...
This isn’t so much a book about role-playing games as much as it’s a book about the business of role-playing games. Or, just business in general. It’s the history of D&D and Tactical Studies Rules (TSR), for sure, but from a purely business standpoint. It follows the rise of the company from...
Wonderful book about the history of D&D and role-playing in general. The author is a journalist, and the book is both an objective history and a personal reflection. The book is…tender, in places. It discusses the subject with clear emotional history and baggage, and I loved it for that. But hidden...