A Spell for Chameleon
TLDR: “It did not hold up when re-reading it, 30 years down the road.”
I originally read this novel in high school. I think I got 10 installments into the series before I graduated, and it turns out the series has grown to 40+ novels. It was essentially Harry Potter before that was even a thing – grand adventures in a magical world, sheltered from the real world (called “Mundania”).
So, I read it again, in the hopes that it would spark the same wonder in me and prompt me to collect the entire series as a middle-aged man.
Sadly, it just didn’t hold up. The plot was meandering and weird. I kept waiting to fall into it like when I was a teenager, but it never seemed to happen.
I remember some neat wordplay throughout the series. But I didn’t find that (maybe that came later?).
Also, the book is quite sexually charged. There’s lots of nudity and implied sexual innuendo, which is making me wonder if that’s why I was so into the book as a teenager? I’ve since learned that the author has been criticized for his portrayal of women (note: the book was written in 1977).
…I might read the second installment, just to give the series another chance. But I’m a little disappointed right now.
I posted about this to the Fediverse, and a friend responded:
I’ve come to believe that “never meet your heroes” pairs well with “never re-read your middle-to-high-school faves”
Book Info
- I have read this book. According to my records, I completed it on .
- A softcover copy of this book is currently in my home library.