<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Oxford Comma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deanebarker.net/blog/post/250/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deanebarker.net/blog/post/250</link>
	<description>It's like an electronic mirror, into which I can gaze.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:46:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://deanebarker.net/blog/post/250/comment-page-1#comment-8373</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanebarker.net/blog/?p=250#comment-8373</guid>
		<description>This brings to mind a few questions.

1.  Why is it both serial and Oxford?

2.  Is it really discussed that often that is needs two separate names?

3.  How did you learn this?  :)


Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This brings to mind a few questions.</p>
<p>1.  Why is it both serial and Oxford?</p>
<p>2.  Is it really discussed that often that is needs two separate names?</p>
<p>3.  How did you learn this?  <img src='http://deanebarker.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deane</title>
		<link>http://deanebarker.net/blog/post/250/comment-page-1#comment-8307</link>
		<dc:creator>deane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanebarker.net/blog/?p=250#comment-8307</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If you want to use it, though, I won’t judge you. Very much.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because secretly you know I&#039;m right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If you want to use it, though, I won’t judge you. Very much.</p></blockquote>
<p>Because secretly you know I&#8217;m right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey V.</title>
		<link>http://deanebarker.net/blog/post/250/comment-page-1#comment-8306</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanebarker.net/blog/?p=250#comment-8306</guid>
		<description>I learned the term from Eats, Shoots and Leaves, and since it&#039;s a British book, it was discouraged (though it did make allowances for the American way).

When I write copy, I try to go without it unless it causes confusion. This is done for two reasons: first, it&#039;s easier to proof, since I know every piece that leaves our office will be Oxford Comma-less; second, I find it to be more aesthetically pleasing. It makes your sentence look a lot cleaner.

If you want to use it, though, I won&#039;t judge you. Very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I learned the term from Eats, Shoots and Leaves, and since it&#8217;s a British book, it was discouraged (though it did make allowances for the American way).</p>
<p>When I write copy, I try to go without it unless it causes confusion. This is done for two reasons: first, it&#8217;s easier to proof, since I know every piece that leaves our office will be Oxford Comma-less; second, I find it to be more aesthetically pleasing. It makes your sentence look a lot cleaner.</p>
<p>If you want to use it, though, I won&#8217;t judge you. Very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris_</title>
		<link>http://deanebarker.net/blog/post/250/comment-page-1#comment-8303</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanebarker.net/blog/?p=250#comment-8303</guid>
		<description>If you think about it syntactically, you are doubling up on your indicators of a sequence with a comma and the word &quot;and&quot; right on top of each other.  Secondly, just using the word &quot;and&quot; is a good way to identify the end of the sequence.

I was always told in school that it was correct either way, but after about 11th grade I stopped using the &quot;oxford comma&quot;.  I never knew it had a name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think about it syntactically, you are doubling up on your indicators of a sequence with a comma and the word &#8220;and&#8221; right on top of each other.  Secondly, just using the word &#8220;and&#8221; is a good way to identify the end of the sequence.</p>
<p>I was always told in school that it was correct either way, but after about 11th grade I stopped using the &#8220;oxford comma&#8221;.  I never knew it had a name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

